“Paper or plastic, sir?” … “Yes …”

This resembles conversations we have with clients in evaluating their property and liability insurance coverage.  They know they have it, but that is about it. 

Though we do not sell home or auto insurance, our financial planning process involves helping clients address their unique financial risks.  And one often overlooked is sufficient property insurance coverage.

The day Hurricane Sandy made landfall, Les Christie published an article on CNN Money’s website about the perils of “hurricane deductible” provisions in homeowner insurance policies.  (See the article here at http://money.cnn.com/2012/10/29/pf/insurance/hurricane-deductible/index.html?iid=SF_PF_Lead.)

Now we may not have beachfront homes in East Tennessee, but we do have hail storms and other natural disasters that can severely damage your home and other property.  And after these events, you have doubtless encountered complaints about what insurance will and will not cover in repairing this damage.  Unfortunately, much of what is disputed is clearly spelled out in the policies that homeowners have failed to properly understand.

So more than simply having insurance coverage on your home and property, you should understand what it covers and how it works.  To help you better understand home insurance, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners provides a free guide, which can be accessed at http://www.naic.org/documents/consumer_guide_home.pdf.

The Medicare system has changed over the past several years, and so have available options during annual open enrollment from October 15, to December 7.  In a recent Kiplinger article, Kimberly Lankford summarizes opportunities and choices.  Find it here.

In 96 hours, millions of Americans will step into the voting booth to decide who will win one of the most highly publicized (and politicized) presidential elections in our history.

As both candidates have told voters, the choice is clear who to elect. Concerns about the deficit, jobs and how to grow the economy are key issues that will drive voters to vote as Nov. 7 nears.

Now, imagine you are stepping into the same booth to vote for your investment adviser.  Are you closer to meeting your retirement goals than when you began working with this person? Are you better off now than you were four years ago? 

Investors choose who they want to work (or not work) with to help them achieve their financial goals.   There are many choices in the investment world. 

Some investors choose to manage their assets themselves using discount brokerage firms. Others use salespeople who charge commissions for their services and those advisers who charge fees for the services they provide. These salespeople are compensated at the time they sell a product to an investor.  They are required to ensure that the product you’re buying (stock, mutual fund, annuity) is suitable at the time you make the transaction.  The broker has no incentive to follow up with you down the road to see how you’re progressing toward your financial goals or navigating a turbulent market.

A fee-based adviser who charges a fee to manage your assets or give you planning advice is held to a fiduciary standard that requires them to put your best interest ahead of their own on an ongoing basis— not just at the time you invest. This adviser is with you along the way to help you meet your goals. I recommend using a fee-based adviser.

At our firm, we provide daily account performance monitoring, so clients can track their progress and measure how they’re doing in meeting their retirement goals. Investors should inquire about what type and frequency of performance monitoring is available before signing on with an adviser. 

As the election results come in on Tuesday night, ask yourself about the choice you made to work with your current investment adviser.  If you had to vote on whether or not to re-elect your financial adviser this year, how would you vote?  The choice is very clear on who you should partner with to meet your investment goals.

I have learned through experience that your gut instinct is usually right; maybe, it’s time for a gut check.

CNN Money’s Chris Isidore outlines the expected cost of living increase for Social Security recipients for 2013.  In his report, he quotes Steven Cunningham of The American Institute for Economic Research, who does not expect the increase to be sufficient in covering the actual rise in seniors’ living costs.  Check out the article on CNN Money’s website at

 

http://money.cnn.com/2012/10/09/news/economy/social-security-benefits/index.html?hpt=hp_t3

 




After the first Presidential debate we took the CNN transcript and collected the replies form both Obama and Romney. Here are word clouds of each participant’s answers courtesy of wordle.net.

While we tweaked the color and randomized the layout, we let the wordle.net algorithm weight the words. Can you match up the cloud to the candidate?


We also submitted each candidate’s replies to writingtester.com and both candidates received identical scores of 49 for readability and 7th grade for reading level. We’ll leave further analysis and inference to you. President Obama’s replies were first and Governor Romney’s were second.